Richard C. Kuriger III v. Marshall Davis Brown, Jr. Individually and Pavlas & Brown, LLP N/K/A Pavlas, Brown & Newey, LLP

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 5, 2008
Docket14-08-00162-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Richard C. Kuriger III v. Marshall Davis Brown, Jr. Individually and Pavlas & Brown, LLP N/K/A Pavlas, Brown & Newey, LLP (Richard C. Kuriger III v. Marshall Davis Brown, Jr. Individually and Pavlas & Brown, LLP N/K/A Pavlas, Brown & Newey, LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard C. Kuriger III v. Marshall Davis Brown, Jr. Individually and Pavlas & Brown, LLP N/K/A Pavlas, Brown & Newey, LLP, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 5, 2008

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 5, 2008.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-08-00162-CV

RICHARD C. KURIGER, III, Appellant

V.

MARSHALL DAVIS BROWN, JR., INDIVIDUALLY, AND PAVLAS & BROWN, L.L.P. N/K/A PAVLAS, BROWN & NEWEY, L.L.P., Appellees

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2003-62061

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N


This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 20, 2008.  The notice of appeal was filed on February 27, 2008.  To date, our records show that appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent);Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same).

After being given the requisite ten-days= notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant has not paid the filing fee in accordance with our order of May 1, 2007.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.  Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time)

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed June 5, 2008.

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Seymore, and Guzman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Richard C. Kuriger III v. Marshall Davis Brown, Jr. Individually and Pavlas & Brown, LLP N/K/A Pavlas, Brown & Newey, LLP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-c-kuriger-iii-v-marshall-davis-brown-jr-in-texapp-2008.