Richard C. Kuriger III v. Marshall Davis Brown, Jr. Individually and Pavlas & Brown, LLP N/K/A Pavlas, Brown & Newey, LLP
This text of Richard C. Kuriger III v. Marshall Davis Brown, Jr. Individually and Pavlas & Brown, LLP N/K/A Pavlas, Brown & Newey, LLP (Richard C. Kuriger III v. Marshall Davis Brown, Jr. Individually and Pavlas & Brown, LLP N/K/A Pavlas, Brown & Newey, LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 5, 2008.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-08-00162-CV
RICHARD C. KURIGER, III, Appellant
V.
MARSHALL DAVIS BROWN, JR., INDIVIDUALLY, AND PAVLAS & BROWN, L.L.P. N/K/A PAVLAS, BROWN & NEWEY, L.L.P., Appellees
On Appeal from the 234th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2003-62061
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 20, 2008. The notice of appeal was filed on February 27, 2008. To date, our records show that appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent);Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same).
After being given the requisite ten-days= notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant has not paid the filing fee in accordance with our order of May 1, 2007. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed June 5, 2008.
Panel consists of Justices Frost, Seymore, and Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richard C. Kuriger III v. Marshall Davis Brown, Jr. Individually and Pavlas & Brown, LLP N/K/A Pavlas, Brown & Newey, LLP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-c-kuriger-iii-v-marshall-davis-brown-jr-in-texapp-2008.