Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Richard Bryson v. State of Florida

Richard Bryson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 29, 2018·No. 18-0517·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D18-0517 _____________________________

RICHARD BRYSON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus – Original Jurisdiction.

March 29, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as premature.

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Richard Bryson, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Bryson v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Richard Bryson v. State of Florida (Richard Bryson v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.