Richard Bridges v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 2, 2018·No. 5D18-973·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RICHARD BRIDGES,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D18-973

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed July 6, 2018

3.853 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge.

Richard E. Bridges, Blountstown, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED without prejudice to Appellant filing a facially sufficient motion if he can

do so in good faith. See Rosa v. State, 147 So. 3d 583, 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

COHEN, C.J. and EVANDER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Bridges v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Richard Bridges v. State (Richard Bridges v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hector Rosa v. State
147 So. 3d 583 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)