Richard Brian Bird v. Chuck Reese, Lt., Margaret Wall, and Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Osp
This text of 875 F.2d 256 (Richard Brian Bird v. Chuck Reese, Lt., Margaret Wall, and Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Osp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Appellant appeals from the district court order denying his motion for a default judgment. Because such a denial is not a final appealable order, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See McNutt v. Cardox Corp., 329 F.2d 107, 108 (6th Cir.1964).
Moreover, appellant did not file his notice of appeal within the 30-day time *257 period required under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a). This time period is mandatory and jurisdictional. See Pettibone v. Cupp, 666 F.2d 333, 334 (9th Cir.1981).
Accordingly, appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction is granted. This appeal is hereby dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
875 F.2d 256, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6938, 1989 WL 52756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-brian-bird-v-chuck-reese-lt-margaret-wall-and-manfred-maass-ca9-1989.