Richard Botimer v. Attorney Grievance Commission
This text of Richard Botimer v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Richard Botimer v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 4, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman 143254 Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, RICHARD BOTIMER, Justices Plaintiff, v SC: 143254 AGC: 1722/06 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
VIVIANO, J., not participating.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 4, 2013 _________________________________________ s0225 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richard Botimer v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-botimer-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2013.