Richard Bichler v. Union Bank and Trust Company of Grand Rapids, a Michigan Banking Institution Wometco West Michigan Tv, Inc.

718 F.2d 802, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16235
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 6, 1983·No. 82-1103·Published

Opinion

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular service has voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court, 715 F.2d 1059 (6th Cir.1983) is vacated, issuance of the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal. The Clerk will direct the parties concerning the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Bichler v. Union Bank and Trust Company of Grand Rapids, a Michigan Banking Institution Wometco West Michigan Tv, Inc., 718 F.2d 802, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16235 (6th Cir. 1983).

718 F.2d 802 (Richard Bichler v. Union Bank and Trust Company of Grand Rapids, a Michigan Banking Institution Wometco West Michigan Tv, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richard Bichler v. Union Bank and Trust Co.
715 F.2d 1059 (Sixth Circuit, 1983)