Richard Bannerman v. Mountain State Pawn, Incorporated

436 F. App'x 151
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 27, 2011
Docket10-2397
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 436 F. App'x 151 (Richard Bannerman v. Mountain State Pawn, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard Bannerman v. Mountain State Pawn, Incorporated, 436 F. App'x 151 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants Richard and Tricia Banner-man, Jesse and Pamela Bryan, Shawn and Melissa Foster, and William and Shellie Gardner, husbands and wives, sued Mountain State Pawn, Inc., d/b/a Famous Pawnbrokers/Jewelry & Loan (“Mountain State”), for injuries the men sustained during a shooting that occurred at the Quality Inn and Conference Center in Jefferson County, West Virginia. The shooter, a convicted felon, had purchased the pistol at issue from Mountain State, and Appellants alleged that the illegal sale of a firearm to a convicted felon proximately caused their injuries.

As noted by the district court, Appellants’ action was barred by the statute of limitations. Moreover, neither the Gun Control Act, under 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(1) (2006), nor the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (“PLCAA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 7901 (2006) et. seq., provided Appellants with a civil cause of action. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons as stated by the district court in its thorough opinion on the matter. Bannerman v. Mountain State Pawn, Inc., No. 3:10-cv-00046-JPB (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ramos v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
202 F. Supp. 3d 457 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
436 F. App'x 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-bannerman-v-mountain-state-pawn-incorporated-ca4-2011.