Richard Ball v. W.S. Farish, III, Lazy F. Ranch, and Stanford Clark Stratton
This text of Richard Ball v. W.S. Farish, III, Lazy F. Ranch, and Stanford Clark Stratton (Richard Ball v. W.S. Farish, III, Lazy F. Ranch, and Stanford Clark Stratton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-05-011-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
_________________________________________________________
RICHARD BALL, Appellant,
v.
W. S. FARISH, III, ET AL., Appellees.
On appeal from the 24th District Court
of Goliad County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, RICHARD BALL, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 24th District Court of Goliad County, Texas, in cause number 02-5-8374-CV. Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states that the parties have settled the case through the mediation process and no further relief is sought in this Court. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 16th day of June, 2005.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richard Ball v. W.S. Farish, III, Lazy F. Ranch, and Stanford Clark Stratton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-ball-v-ws-farish-iii-lazy-f-ranch-and-stan-texapp-2005.