RICHARD B. GREEN AND RAYMOND M. GREEN vs MARGARET GREEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF QUENTIN L. GREEN
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
RICHARD B. GREEN AND RAYMOND M. GREEN,
Appellants,
Case No. 5D22-430
v. LT Case No. 2017-CP-001518
MARGARET GREEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF QUENTIN L. GREEN,
Appellee.
____________________________________/
Opinion filed October 28, 2022
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Donna Goerner, Judge.
T. Todd Pittenger and Kelly J. H. Garcia, of GrayRobinson, P.A., Orlando, for Appellants.
Meredith Pitts Smith, of Copeland Covert & Smith PLLC, Altamonte Springs, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Richard and Raymond Green (“Appellants”) appeal the trial court’s order granting partial summary judgment in favor of Margaret Green,
individually and as personal representative of the estate of Quentin Green (“Appellee”). We agree with Appellants that the trial court violated their due process rights and proper procedure by ruling on an issue not raised in Appellee’s motion for partial summary judgment. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court with instructions to vacate the order. 1
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
EVANDER, COHEN and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
1 We offer no opinion as to the merits of the trial court’s ruling.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
RICHARD B. GREEN AND RAYMOND M. GREEN vs MARGARET GREEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF QUENTIN L. GREEN (RICHARD B. GREEN AND RAYMOND M. GREEN vs MARGARET GREEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF QUENTIN L. GREEN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.