Richard B. Dickerson v. Health Midwest
This text of 170 F. App'x 18 (Richard B. Dickerson v. Health Midwest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Richard Dickerson (Dickerson) appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination suit. We dismiss the appeal as untimely, because Dickerson failed to file his notice of appeal within thirty days after the district court entered its judgment, as required under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1), or to move timely, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5), for an extension of time to appeal, see Fed. R.App. P. 26(b)(1) (court may not extend time to file notice of appeal except as authorized by Rule 4).
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Burgs v. Johnson County, Iowa, 79 F.3d 701, 702 (8th Cir.1996) (per curiam).
. The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 F. App'x 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-b-dickerson-v-health-midwest-ca8-2006.