Richard Aquirre, Jr. Richard Aguirre, Jr. Richard Aguirre v. State
This text of Richard Aquirre, Jr. Richard Aguirre, Jr. Richard Aguirre v. State (Richard Aquirre, Jr. Richard Aguirre, Jr. Richard Aguirre v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-17-00349-CR
RICHARD AQUIRRE, JR., APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 84th District Court Ochiltree County, Texas Trial Court No. 5183, Honorable Curt Brancheau, Presiding
May 17, 2018
ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ.
Pending before the court is an appeal by Richard Aguirre, Jr. from his criminal
conviction. His attorney filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in which we were told that
appellant no longer desired to prosecute the matter. The motion failed to comply with the
rules of appellate procedure. That is, appellant’s signature did not appear on the
document as required by Rule 42.2(a). See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). We brought this
omission to the attention of appellant’s attorney, Todd Alvey, and directed Alvey to file a
corrected motion by May 9, 2018, complying with that rule. No corrected motion has been filed. Nor has Alvey deigned to provide us with any explanation why he failed to heed our
directive. Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court.
The trial court is ordered to convene a hearing, upon reasonable notice, to
determine whether appellant (1) desires to prosecute this appeal, and (2) is indigent. If
both answers to those questions are yes, then the trial court shall also determine whether
appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel. The argument and
evidence, if any, presented at the hearing will be transcribed into a supplemental
reporter’s record, which record the trial court shall cause to be filed with the Clerk of this
Court by June 7, 2018. The trial court must also execute any written findings of fact and
conclusions of law relevant to the matter. If it is determined that appellant desires to
prosecute the appeal, is indigent, and has been denied the effective assistance of
counsel, then the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant. So too
must it include in its findings the name, address, and state bar number of the newly
appointed counsel. The findings of fact executed by the trial court also shall be included
in a supplemental clerk’s record which the trial court will cause to be filed with the Clerk
of this Court by June 7, 2018. Should further time be needed to complete the foregoing
tasks, same must be requested before June 7, 2018.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richard Aquirre, Jr. Richard Aguirre, Jr. Richard Aguirre v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-aquirre-jr-richard-aguirre-jr-richard-aguirre-v-state-texapp-2018.