Richard Andrew Wetmore v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: December 21, 2011
• Docket: 10-11-00422-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-11-00422-CR

RICHARD ANDREW WETMORE, Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 13th District Court Navarro County, Texas Trial Court No. 33239-CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Richard Wetmore attempts to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to

suppress. By letter dated November 8, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Wetmore

that the appeal was subject to dismissal because it appeared that this Court does not

have jurisdiction over the trial court’s interlocutory order. See McKown v. State, 915

S.W.2d 160 (Tex. App.─Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). The Clerk also warned Wetmore that

the appeal would be dismissed unless, within 21 days of the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3.

Wetmore has not filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.

We do not have jurisdiction to consider Wetmore’s interlocutory appeal.

McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d at 161. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed December 21, 2011 Do not publish [CR25]

Wetmore v. State Page 2