Richard Alan Taylor v. the State of Texas
This text of Richard Alan Taylor v. the State of Texas (Richard Alan Taylor v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-25-00110-CR
RICHARD ALAN TAYLOR, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 47th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 081436-A-CR, Honorable Dee Johnson, Presiding
July 22, 2025 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Richard Alan Taylor, appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual
assault of a child 1 and sentence to sixty years of confinement. The reporter’s record was
originally due May 19, 2025, but we granted the reporter two extensions to file the record
due to her caseload. By letter of June 20, 2025, we admonished the reporter that failure
to file the reporter’s record by July 9 could result in the appeal being abated and the cause
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021(a)(2)(B). remanded to the trial court for further proceedings without further notice. The reporter
has since requested a third extension of thirty days to file the reporter’s record.
To expedite the disposition of this appeal and in the interest of conservation of
judicial resources, we deny the request for extension, abate the appeal, and remand the
cause to the trial court for further proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and
appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely
filed.”); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring appellate courts to “make whatever order is appropriate to
avoid further delay and to preserve the parties’ rights” when the appellate record is not
timely filed). On remand, the trial court shall determine the following:
(1) what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;
(2) what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those tasks; and
(3) whether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial court finds reasonable.
Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than forty-five
days to complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute
reporter to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address
the aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by September
2, 2025.
Should the reporter file the record on or before the date the trial court acts per our
directive, she shall immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the
trial court shall not be required to take any further action.
2 It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richard Alan Taylor v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-alan-taylor-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.