Richard Alan Johnson v. Elizabeth Marie Johnson
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-10-00356-CV
|
Richard Alan Johnson |
APPELLANT |
|
|
V. |
||
|
Elizabeth Marie Johnson |
APPELLEE |
|
------------
FROM THE 233rd District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
On December 7, 2010, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3. We have not received any response.
Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEI ER, JJ.
DELIVERED: January 6, 2011
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richard Alan Johnson v. Elizabeth Marie Johnson (Richard Alan Johnson v. Elizabeth Marie Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.