Richard A. Ench v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Third Circuit

Richard A. Ench v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

325 F.2d 1017

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 17, 1964·No. 14462_1·Published

Opinion

325 F.2d 1017

64-1 USTC P 9199

Richard A. ENCH, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 14462.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Dec. 13, 1963.
Decided Jan. 17, 1964.

Anthony R. Amabile, Paterson, N.J., for petitioner.

Robert J. Golten, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Joseph Kovner, Attys., Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

We can perceive no error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Tax Court. Accordingly, its decision will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

325 F.2d 1017

64-1 USTC P 9199

Richard A. ENCH, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 14462.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Dec. 13, 1963.
Decided Jan. 17, 1964.

Anthony R. Amabile, Paterson, N.J., for petitioner.

Robert J. Golten, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Joseph Kovner, Attys., Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

We can perceive no error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Tax Court. Accordingly, its decision will be affirmed.

Richard A. Ench v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 325 F.2d 1017 (3d Cir. 1964).

Pincite

325 F.2d 1017 (Richard A. Ench v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.