Richard A. Ench v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 325 F.2d 1017 (Richard A. Ench v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
325 F.2d 1017
64-1 USTC P 9199
Richard A. ENCH, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 14462.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Dec. 13, 1963.
Decided Jan. 17, 1964.
Anthony R. Amabile, Paterson, N.J., for petitioner.
Robert J. Golten, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Joseph Kovner, Attys., Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit judges.
PER CURIAM.
We can perceive no error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Tax Court. Accordingly, its decision will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
325 F.2d 1017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-a-ench-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca3-1964.