Rich v. Valente
230 A.D. 829
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1930
StatusPublished
This text of 230 A.D. 829 (Rich v. Valente) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rich v. Valente, 230 A.D. 829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
Opinion
[830]*830Motion for restraining order denied, with ten dollars costs.' Motion for peremptory mandamus order denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion that papers in habeas corpus proceedings be included among the papers on the motion for peremptory mandamus order denied. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Sherman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
230 A.D. 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rich-v-valente-nyappdiv-1930.