Rich v. Treu

55 A. 492, 25 R.I. 208, 1903 R.I. LEXIS 46
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedMay 20, 1903
StatusPublished

This text of 55 A. 492 (Rich v. Treu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rich v. Treu, 55 A. 492, 25 R.I. 208, 1903 R.I. LEXIS 46 (R.I. 1903).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

(1) In Crafts v. Carr, 24 R. I. 397, we decided that the services rendered by the plaintiff as an attorney-at-law in a civil case were legal necessaries for the minor defendant, and that such minor was liable therefor. There are no words of limitation used in chapter 841, section 2, of the Public Laws, restricting the necessaries therein mentioned to articles of food, clothing, or shelter, or to other articles of a similar nature.

The court is of opinion that the garnishee was properly *209 charged, and that the exceptions must be dismissed and the case remanded to the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District.

Wm. G. Rich, for plaintiff: Wm. C. Bliss, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A. 492, 25 R.I. 208, 1903 R.I. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rich-v-treu-ri-1903.