Rich v. State of New York
Opinion
USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED BENJAMIN SAMUEL RICH fka SAMUEL DOC □□ —______ GUILLAUME, DATE FILED: _ 10/4/2022
Plaintiff, -against- 21 Civ. 3835 (AT) (GWG) DETECTIVE MICHAEL MILLER and DETECTIVE ORDER VINCENT CORRANDO, Defendants. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Having received no objections to the Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”), ECF No. 86, of the Honorable Gabriel W. Gorenstein, the Court reviewed the R&R for clear error and found none. Oquendo v. Colvin, No. 12 Civ. 4527, 2014 WL 4160222, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2014). The Court, therefore, ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to strike is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF Nos. 73-74 and mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff pro se. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 4, 2022 New York, New York ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rich v. State of New York (Rich v. State of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.