Rich v. State

128 S.E. 820, 34 Ga. App. 181, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 127
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rich v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Ga. App. 153
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 14, 1925·No. 15945·Published

Opinion

Bboyees, C. J.

The accused, was tried for the offense of rape and convicted of an assault with intent to rape. His motion for a new trial was overruled, and this judgment was affirmed by this court on December 9, 1924 (33 Ga. App. 153, 126 S. E. 154). On certiorari the judgment of this court was reversed on June 20, 1925, the Supreme Court holding, in effect, that the evidence for the State, if credible, demanded a finding that the offense of rape had been committed, and that there was no evidence authorizing the verdict returned. 160 Ga. 513. In view of that ruling, it is hereby ordered that the former judgment of this court in this case be vacated; and the judgment of the trial court is reversed on the ground that the verdict was unauthorized under the law and the evidence.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rich v. State, 128 S.E. 820, 34 Ga. App. 181, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 127 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

128 S.E. 820 (Rich v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rich v. State
128 S.E. 666 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)
Rich v. State
126 S.E. 154 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)