Rich v. State

558 S.E.2d 720, 274 Ga. 695, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 159, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 30
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 14, 2002
DocketS01A1807
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 558 S.E.2d 720 (Rich v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rich v. State, 558 S.E.2d 720, 274 Ga. 695, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 159, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 30 (Ga. 2002).

Opinion

SEARS, Presiding Justice.

Appellant Harry James Rich appeals his convictions for murder, aggravated assault and aggravated battery.1 In his sole enumeration [696]*696of error, appellant claims the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdicts. The evidence of record establishes that appellant shared a home with his wife and her twin sister. One evening, following a domestic dispute, appellant stabbed his wife in the back of her arm with a kitchen knife. He then chased her out of the home and toward a neighbor’s house, all the while slashing at her with the knife and cutting her. The wife’s sister then came out of the home and yelled for appellant to stop, whereupon he began pursuing her. The wife’s sister ran to a different neighbor’s house, but appellant caught her, stabbed her repeatedly and slashed her throat, killing her. When taken into custody shortly after the attacks, appellant had several fresh cuts and slashes on his arms. Several knives were recovered from the area of the crime scene, all of which were covered in blood later determined to be the blood of appellant’s wife and her deceased sister. Appellant’s wife survived the attack and testified on behalf of the State at appellant’s trial.

Decided January 14, 2002. Jerry W. Moncus, for appellant. Kermit N. McManus, District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The evidence of record, construed most favorably to the verdict, was sufficient to enable rational triers of fact to find appellant guilty beyond all reasonable doubt of the crimes of which he was convicted.2

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reed v. State
727 S.E.2d 112 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
558 S.E.2d 720, 274 Ga. 695, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 159, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rich-v-state-ga-2002.