Rich v. State

858 So. 2d 1210, 2003 WL 22658051
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 2003·No. 4D02-3588·Published·Cited by 34 cases

Opinion

858 So.2d 1210 (2003)

Stanley RICH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D02-3588.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 12, 2003.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse appellant's conviction for aggravated battery because the trial court negated appellant's self-defense claim by instructing the jury that the use of force was not justified if appellant was committing or attempting to commit aggravated battery. In Giles v. State, 831 So.2d 1263, 1265 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), we held that this instruction, which is based upon section 776.041, Florida Statutes (2002), was applicable only in circumstances where the person claiming self-defense is engaged in another independent forcible felony at the time. Giving this instruction where the only charge against the defendant is the aggravated battery, which also was the act that the defendant claimed was self-defense, would improperly negate the self-defense claim. See id. at 1266.

Although appellant did not object to this instruction, we hold that it is fundamental error. "An incorrect jury instruction on the defense of justifiable use of deadly and non-deadly force constitutes fundamental error if there is a reasonable possibility that the instruction may have led to the conviction." Thomas v. State, 831 So.2d 253, 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (citations omitted). We determined in Giles that this instruction was misleading, and it was reasonably possible that it contributed to Giles' conviction under circumstances similar to this case. 831 So.2d at 1266. In addition, we have held that fundamental *1211 error results where an inaccurate and misleading instruction negates a defendant's only defense. See Davis v. State, 804 So.2d 400, 404 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Reversed and remanded.

GUNTHER, WARNER and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rich v. State, 858 So. 2d 1210, 2003 WL 22658051 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

858 So. 2d 1210 (Rich v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Furney v. State
115 So. 3d 1095 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Clark v. State
23 So. 3d 1213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Ocasio v. State
994 So. 2d 1258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Martinez v. State
981 So. 2d 449 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
Sipple v. State
972 So. 2d 912 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Barnes v. State
969 So. 2d 1117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Sloss v. State
965 So. 2d 1204 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Permenter v. State
953 So. 2d 647 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Blanton v. State
956 So. 2d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Zinnerman v. State
942 So. 2d 932 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Jackson v. State
935 So. 2d 107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Martinez v. State
933 So. 2d 1155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Bertke v. State
927 So. 2d 76 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Granberry v. State
919 So. 2d 699 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Shepard v. Crosby
916 So. 2d 861 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Federic v. State
909 So. 2d 458 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Bevan v. State
908 So. 2d 524 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Craven v. State
908 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Ortiz v. State
905 So. 2d 1016 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Hawk v. State
902 So. 2d 331 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)