Rich v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedMarch 10, 2017
Docket15-1329
StatusUnpublished

This text of Rich v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Rich v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rich v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2017).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

******************** * JULIE RICH, * * No. 15-1329v Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * Filed: February 13, 2017 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; influenza (“flu”) vaccine; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * optic neuritis; vision loss. * Respondent. * ******************** *

Dianna L. Stadelnikas, Magnolia, Christopher, and Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for Petitioner; Amy P. Kokot, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

On February 10, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Julie Rich on November 5, 2015. In her petition, petitioner alleged that the influenza vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), and which she received on November 6, 2010, caused her to develop optic neuritis and/or vision loss in her right eye. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her condition.

Respondent denies that the influenza vaccine caused petitioner to suffer optic neuritis, vision loss in her right eye, or any other injury.

1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

a. A lump sum payment of $175,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Julie Rich. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a); and

b. A lump sum payment of $148.91, which amount represents reimbursement of a State of Illinois Medicaid lien , in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and:

Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services Bureau of Collections Technical Recovery Section P.O. Box 19174 Springfield, IL 62794-9174 ATTN: Mr. Kevin Thornton Kevin.Thornton@illinois.gov

Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 15-1329V according to this decision and the attached stipulation.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) JULIE RICH, ) ) . Petitioner, ) ) No. l 5- I 329V (ECF) v. ) Special Master Moran ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERV ICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~)

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the fo llowing motters:

I. Julie Rich, peti tio ner, fil ed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National

Vaccine Inj ury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa- 10 to -34 (the "Vaccine Program'').

The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt of the

influenza ("flu ") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vacc ine Injury Table (the ''Table"),

42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitione1· received a flu vaccination on or about October 30, 20 13.

3. The vacci ne was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that the flu vaccine caused her to deve lop optic neuritis and/or vision

loss in her right eye. Petitioner further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of these

i1tjuries for more tha n six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of her condition. 6. Respondent denies thnt the flu vaccine admin istered on or about October 30, 20 13, is

the cause of petitioner's alleged optic neuritis and/or vision loss in her right eye and/or any other I

injury or her current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the pa1ties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of th is Stipu lation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipu lation, and after petitioner has filed an election to rece ive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 l(a)( 1), the Secretary of Health and Human Serv ices wil l issue

the fo llowing vaccine compensation payments:

a. A lump sum of $175,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be avai lable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l S(a); and

b. A lump sum of $ 148.9 l, which amount represents reimbursement of a State of Illinois Med icaid lien, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and:

Ill inois Department of 1-lealthcare and Family Services Bureau of Col lections Techn ical Recovery Section P.O. Box 191 74 Spri ngfield, IL 62794-91 74 Atln: Mr. Kevin Thornton Kevin.Thornton@i llinois.gov

Petitioner agrees to endorse this check to the 11 linois Department of Healthcare and

Fami ly Services.

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has fried both a proper and ti mely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-2 I(a)( I), and an applicati on, the parties wi ll submit to further proceedings befo re

2 the special master to awurd reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceed ing upon this

petition.

10. Petitioner and her attorney represent that they have identified to respondent a ll

known sources of payment for items or services for which the Program is not primarily Iiable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- I 5(g), including State compensation programs, insurance policies,

Federal or State hea lth benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42

U.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-2
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rich v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rich-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2017.