Rich v. Sargent Granite Co.
This text of 30 N.Y.S. 139 (Rich v. Sargent Granite Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I think, under section 1788 of the Code, a temporary receiver has power to maintain any action or special proceeding for the purpose of collecting, receiving, or preserving the property of the corporation, and that a proceeding to examine any person who is alleged to have in Ms possession property that should be taken possession of by the receiver is a special proceeding for the purpose of collecting, receiving, and preserving the property of the corporation. The provisions of the Revised Statutes under which this application is made appear to be still in force,1 and if the receiver brings himself within the provisions of the statute it would seem that he would be entitled to the relief asked; and I tMnk the [140]*140affidavits are sufficient to entitle him to such relief. It appears that Matthew Baird was the principal stockholder, a trustee, and the treasurer of the corporation, and that on the 16th of April, 1892, he resigned as trustee and treasurer, and transferred all his stock to one Harrington, who was thereupon elected a trustee of the company, and its president, and that subsequently Matthew Baird became, by virtue of a bill of sale in the nature of an equitable mortgage, the owner of most of the property of the company. ' Said Baird claims title to such property under various bills of sale and leases, and under a sale made by the sheriff of Waldo county, in the state of Maine, upon an execution entered on a judgment in favor of said Baird against the corporation for the sum of $146,000. These facts, of themselves, I think, give the receiver the right to examine into the transactions between Baird and the company, and bring the case within the provision of the statute referred to. The motion will therefore be granted; order or warrant to be settled on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 N.Y.S. 139, 23 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 359, 61 N.Y. St. Rep. 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rich-v-sargent-granite-co-nysupct-1894.