Rich v. Rich
156 A. 442, 109 N.J. Eq. 216, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 567
This text of 156 A. 442 (Rich v. Rich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rich v. Rich, 156 A. 442, 109 N.J. Eq. 216, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 567 (N.J. 1931).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Berry.
For affirmance — The Chief-Jusutice, Trehchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodihe, Daly, Donqes, Vah Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Frank v. Frank
76 A.2d 527 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Kress v. Kress
62 A.2d 881 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1949)
In Re Olcott
55 A.2d 820 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Sevil v. Sevil
43 A.2d 253 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1945)
Soos v. Soos
185 A. 386 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
156 A. 442, 109 N.J. Eq. 216, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rich-v-rich-nj-1931.