Rich v. Rich
156 A. 442, 109 N.J. Eq. 216, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 567
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Berry.
For affirmance — The Chief-Jusutice, Trehchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodihe, Daly, Donqes, Vah Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rich v. Rich, 156 A. 442, 109 N.J. Eq. 216, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 567 (N.J. 1931).
156 A. 442 (Rich v. Rich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Frank v. Frank
76 A.2d 527 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Kress v. Kress
62 A.2d 881 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1949)
In Re Olcott
55 A.2d 820 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Sevil v. Sevil
43 A.2d 253 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1945)
Soos v. Soos
185 A. 386 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)