Rich v. Rich

Supreme Court of Georgia

Rich v. Rich

225 S.E.2d 247, 236 Ga. 839, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1043

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 20, 1976

Docket30915

StatusPublished

This text of 225 S.E.2d 247 (Rich v. Rich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rich v. Rich, 225 S.E.2d 247, 236 Ga. 839, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1043 (Ga. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Gunter, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment that dismissed an application for contempt brought by appellant against her former husband. The appellant did not report temporary alimony payments as income for the taxable years 1973 and 1974. As a result, state and federal assessments were made against her, and her application for contempt contended that the interlocutory order that had awarded her temporary alimony provided for the appellee to assume the income tax liability on the temporary alimony payments made to her.

The problem is that the final judgment in the divorce case, entered March 22, 1974, provided that it evidenced "an accord and satisfaction of all claims of either party [840]*840against the other of every kind and character, except as specifically set forth hereinafter.” And the decree thereinafter did not provide for liability on the part of the appellee for tax assessments made against appellant for failure to include temporary alimony payments, previously paid to her, as income to her.

Submitted March 15, 1976 Decided April 20, 1976 Rehearing denied May 17, 1976. Hunter & Robins, John CalvinHunter, for appellant. Rich, Bass, Kidd & Witcher, R. Hopkins Kidd, for appellee.

Having reviewed the temporary alimony order originally entered and the final judgment rendered in the case, we conclude that the judgment below that dismissed the contempt application was correct.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gunter, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment that dismissed an application for contempt brought by appellant against her former husband. The appellant did not report temporary alimony payments as income for the taxable years 1973 and 1974. As a result, state and federal assessments were made against her, and her application for contempt contended that the interlocutory order that had awarded her temporary alimony provided for the appellee to assume the income tax liability on the temporary alimony payments made to her.

The problem is that the final judgment in the divorce case, entered March 22, 1974, provided that it evidenced "an accord and satisfaction of all claims of either party [840]*840against the other of every kind and character, except as specifically set forth hereinafter.” And the decree thereinafter did not provide for liability on the part of the appellee for tax assessments made against appellant for failure to include temporary alimony payments, previously paid to her, as income to her.

Submitted March 15, 1976 Decided April 20, 1976 Rehearing denied May 17, 1976. Hunter & Robins, John CalvinHunter, for appellant. Rich, Bass, Kidd & Witcher, R. Hopkins Kidd, for appellee.

Having reviewed the temporary alimony order originally entered and the final judgment rendered in the case, we conclude that the judgment below that dismissed the contempt application was correct.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 S.E.2d 247, 236 Ga. 839, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rich-v-rich-ga-1976.