Rich v. Plantation General Hospital Ltd. Partnership

745 So. 2d 462, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15130, 1999 WL 1037938
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 1999·No. No. 98-3432·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying attorney’s fees. Stockman v. Downs, 573 So.2d 835 (Fla.1991); Tucker v. Ohren, 739 So.2d 684 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Green v. Sun Harbor Homeowners’ Ass’n, Inc., 685 So.2d 23 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). We have not considered the cross-appeal issue as it is premature. Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So.2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

STONE, SHAHOOD, JJ., and JULIAN, JOYCE, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rich v. Plantation General Hospital Ltd. Partnership, 745 So. 2d 462, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15130, 1999 WL 1037938 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

745 So. 2d 462 (Rich v. Plantation General Hospital Ltd. Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winkelman v. Toll
632 So. 2d 130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Stockman v. Downs
573 So. 2d 835 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Tucker v. Ohren
739 So. 2d 684 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Green v. SUN HARBOR HOMEOWNERS'ASS'N
685 So. 2d 23 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)