Rich v. Martin
259 So. 2d 336, 261 La. 313
Opinion
Relator has favorable mandamus judgments in both courts ordering his name to be placed on the ballot at the State General Election in February, 1972. He complains only that we should review the court of appeal judgment so that it may become executory. The relator is .fully protected under R.S. 18:631, R.S. 18:-362. See last sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rich v. Martin, 259 So. 2d 336, 261 La. 313 (La. 1971).
259 So. 2d 336 (Rich v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Opinion Number
Louisiana Attorney General Reports, 1992
Dixon v. Hughes
587 So. 2d 679 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1991)
Newman v. City of Baton Rouge
392 So. 2d 100 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1980)
McCarter v. Broom
377 So. 2d 383 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1979)