Rich v. Levy
16 Md. 74, 1860 Md. LEXIS 48
Opinion
delivered the opinion of this court.
We do not discover any reason for disturbing the decree in this cause, From an examination of the record, we think the complainants failed to show that the conveyance was without consideration, and that it was not bona fide.
The learned j udge below having expressed his views at length, on those points, and, as we think, correctly, we may rest the affirmance of the decree on the opinion filed by him.
Decree affirmed %oith costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rich v. Levy, 16 Md. 74, 1860 Md. LEXIS 48 (Md. 1860).
16 Md. 74 (Rich v. Levy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marcus v. Hudgins
176 A. 271 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1935)
Blake v. Gorsuch
171 A. 862 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1934)
Frederick County Nat. Bank v. Shafer
39 A. 320 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1898)
Wallach v. Wylie
28 Kan. 138 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1882)
Crowell v. Horacek
12 Neb. 622 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1882)