Rich v. Board of State Canvassers

1 McGrath 1097, 100 McGrath 453
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rich v. Board of State Canvassers. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 Mich. 453
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 22, 1894·No. No. 13996·Published

Opinion

To compel respondent to reconvene and recanvass votes cast upon the question of the adoption of an amendment to the Constitution, relative to the salary of the Attorney General, where after the Board of State Canvassers had canvassed the votes cast for and against the adoption of the amendment, and after the officers composing the board had gone but of office, it is made to appear that a palpable mistake was committed, due in part to the unauthorized rejection of the returns from one county, and in part to a fraudulent and criminal alteration of the returns from another county, thereby changing the result of the vote in the State.

Granted May 22, 1894.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rich v. Board of State Canvassers, 1 McGrath 1097, 100 McGrath 453 (Mich. 1894).

1 McGrath 1097 (Rich v. Board of State Canvassers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.