Rich v. Benjamin

107 A.D.3d 1552, 966 N.Y.S.2d 709
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 14, 2013·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (Craig J. Doran, A.J.), entered August 31, 2012. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant to compel discovery responses and for a protective order.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by granting those parts of defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to disclose the documents sought in items 8 and 9 of defendant’s demand for production and inspection and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Rich v Benjamin (107 AD3d 1551 [2013]). Present — Scudder, P.J, Peradotto, Sconiers, Valentino and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rich v. Benjamin, 107 A.D.3d 1552, 966 N.Y.S.2d 709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

107 A.D.3d 1552 (Rich v. Benjamin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

RICH, M.D., STEVEN A. v. BENJAMIN, RONALD R.
107 A.D.3d 1551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)