Rich v. Benjamin

107 A.D.3d 1552, 966 N.Y.S.2d 709
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 14, 2013
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 107 A.D.3d 1552 (Rich v. Benjamin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rich v. Benjamin, 107 A.D.3d 1552, 966 N.Y.S.2d 709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (Craig J. Doran, A.J.), entered August 31, 2012. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant to compel discovery responses and for a protective order.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by granting those parts of defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to disclose the documents sought in items 8 and 9 of defendant’s demand for production and inspection and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Rich v Benjamin (107 AD3d 1551 [2013]). Present — Scudder, P.J, Peradotto, Sconiers, Valentino and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

RICH, M.D., STEVEN A. v. BENJAMIN, RONALD R.
107 A.D.3d 1551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 A.D.3d 1552, 966 N.Y.S.2d 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rich-v-benjamin-nyappdiv-2013.