Home/Third Circuit/Rich v. Bailey

Rich v. Bailey

135 F.3d 766, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 38444, 1997 WL 809603
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 1, 1997·No. 97-1058·Published

Opinion

135 F.3d 766

Alfred R. Rich, Sherry Rich
v.
James Bailey, Code Enforcement Officer, Borough of
Glenolden, Borough Council of Glenolden Borough, George E.
Hassel, Denise McCarthy, Sarah A. Dougherty, Joseph
Selfridge, Theodore Bathurst, Karen Carlucci, Francis
O'Neill, Albert Kelley, William Reese

NO. 97-1058

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Dec 01, 1997

Appeal From: E.D.Pa. ,No.9506932 ,

Waldman, J.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rich v. Bailey, 135 F.3d 766, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 38444, 1997 WL 809603 (3d Cir. 1997).

135 F.3d 766 (Rich v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.