Rich Gullet & Sons, Inc. v. Gullet Contracting, LLC

395 S.W.3d 599, 2013 WL 601124, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 198
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 19, 2013·No. No. ED 98143·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in defendants’ favor. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 80 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rich Gullet & Sons, Inc. v. Gullet Contracting, LLC, 395 S.W.3d 599, 2013 WL 601124, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 198 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

395 S.W.3d 599 (Rich Gullet & Sons, Inc. v. Gullet Contracting, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alcorn v. Brown
536 S.W.2d 80 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)