Ricebaum v. United States

Supreme Court

Ricebaum v. United States

307 U.S. 628, 59 S. Ct. 835

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 15, 1939

DocketNo. 861; No. 871

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 307 U.S. 628 (Ricebaum v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ricebaum v. United States, 307 U.S. 628, 59 S. Ct. 835 (1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Mr. [629]*629Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration and decision of these applications. Messrs. A. Walton Nall and George F. Callaghan for petitioners in No. 861. Mr. John M. Slaton for petitioners in No. 871. Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General McMahon, and Messrs. William W. Barron, J. Albert Woll, and' William J. Connor for the United States.

Reported below: 101 F. 2d 628.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Mr. [629]*629Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration and decision of these applications. Messrs. A. Walton Nall and George F. Callaghan for petitioners in No. 861. Mr. John M. Slaton for petitioners in No. 871. Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General McMahon, and Messrs. William W. Barron, J. Albert Woll, and' William J. Connor for the United States.

Reported below: 101 F. 2d 628.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 U.S. 628, 59 S. Ct. 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricebaum-v-united-states-scotus-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack