Rice v. Yakima & Pacific Coast Railway Co.

31 P. 23, 4 Wash. 724, 1892 Wash. LEXIS 304
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 29, 1892
DocketNo. 467
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 P. 23 (Rice v. Yakima & Pacific Coast Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rice v. Yakima & Pacific Coast Railway Co., 31 P. 23, 4 Wash. 724, 1892 Wash. LEXIS 304 (Wash. 1892).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Scott, J. —

Respondents brought an action to recover from the appellant a sum of money alleged to be due them by virtue of an assignment from one W. F. Lowe, who boarded men in the employ of appellant. The assignment was made to cover a sum then due and also such further sum as might become due the assignor in the future for certain months specified by reason of boarding men as aforesaid. The appellant filed a general demurrer to the complaint contending that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action because it did not allege that said assignment was in writing. And appellant further contends that the instrument was void in consequence of its purporting to assign a claim not then in existence. It is admitted, however, that eighty dollars of said sum was earned at the time the assignment was made. It was not necessary that the complaint should allege the assignment to be in writing even though it may have been necessary to have proven a written assignment when the cause came on for trial.

It being admitted that the sum of eighty dollars was due when the assignment was made, a general demurrer would not reach the point that said assignment was not good for the sum to be earned in the future, and there being a cause of action for the said sum due, it follows that the demurrer was rightfully overruled, and the judgment of the superior court is affirmed.

Anders, O. J., and Dunbar, Stiles and Hoyt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

English v. Mound House Plaster Co.
192 F. 717 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 P. 23, 4 Wash. 724, 1892 Wash. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-yakima-pacific-coast-railway-co-wash-1892.