Rice v. Wright
This text of 41 S.C.L. 407 (Rice v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The decision in the case of Wilson, assignee of Norris, vs. Wright, (
For if the indorser may, by paying the judgment against himself, and obtaining an assignment of the judgment against the maker, be allowed to hold that judgment as a purchaser, certainly the bail of McCann, on paying the judgment against himself, will be allowed not only to acquire the judgment against his principal, but also that against the other joint and several maker, where both are principals. He is a purchaser of the judgment, as he had the right to be, for his own protection.
The motion to reverse the Circuit decision is dismissed.
Motion dismissed.
(a) Anto, p.399.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 S.C.L. 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-wright-scctapp-1854.