Rice v. Village of Peekskill
This text of 211 A.D. 814 (Rice v. Village of Peekskill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to change place of trial from Queens county to Westchester county reversed on the law and facts, .with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The alleged accident occurred in the village of Peekskill, and is predicated on the presence of ice and snow on one of the village sidewalks, upon which plaintiff claims she slipped and fell. With the exception of plaintiff, her husband and her mother-in-law, all witnesses to the accident, as well as to the weather and other conditions obtaining at the time, reside in the defendant village, and amongst these are municipal employees. In such circumstances, venue should be changed to the county where the cause of action arose, and which contains the municipal corporation against which the suit is brought. (See Schulz v. Hudson Valley Ry. Co., 147 App. Div. 788; [815]*815Mencke v. Goldberg, 208 id. 820.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
211 A.D. 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-village-of-peekskill-nyappdiv-1924.