Rice v. Viemeister
22 A.D.2d 751, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3043
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 22, 1964
StatusPublished
This text of 22 A.D.2d 751 (Rice v. Viemeister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rice v. Viemeister, 22 A.D.2d 751, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).
Opinion
Motion of appellant to vacate the judgment and grant a new trial is granted. It appears without contradiction that the stenographer has lost [752]*752a material portion of the trial minutes and that an adequate appellate review may not be had. (See Waterman, v. State of New York, 13 A D 2d 619 and cases there cited.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
22 A.D.2d 751, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-viemeister-nyappdiv-1964.