Rice v. United States

27 F.2d 129, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3350
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided June 4, 1928·No. No. 2182·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge.

The United States has filed a motion for rehearing since the announcement of our opinion in the above ease. 24 F.(2d) 479.

In Murby v. United States, 293 F. 849, where the proceedings were under and by virtue of a search warrant, this court held that “what would have happened, or have been found, if the officers had proceeded without process, is a matter of pure conjecture, in which we need not indulge," to whieh we adhere.

It will be noted, also, that in the present case search and seizure was not made as incidental to the arrest, but that the arrest was made following the search and seizure.

Petition is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rice v. United States, 27 F.2d 129, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3350 (1st Cir. 1928).

27 F.2d 129 (Rice v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. White
29 F.2d 294 (D. Nebraska, 1928)