Rice v. Union Railroad Company

58 A. 629, 26 R.I. 128, 1904 R.I. LEXIS 40
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided April 27, 1904·Published

Opinion

(1) Per Curiam.

This case is not properly before us, -the statement of evidence and rulings presented by the plaintiff not having been allowed by the justice who tried the cause, as required by General Laws cap. 251, § 6, nor substantiated by affidavit, as required by section 7 of said chapter. Nop is said statement assented to by defendant as being a full and complete statement of the evidence affecting the rulings in question.

While it is not necessary in all cases to bring up a statement of all the evidence taken in the case, it is necessary tó bring up a statement of .all the evidence which bears upon the questions on which the petition for a new trial, depends, as was done in Hackett v. Shaw, 24 R. I. 29. Vide certificate at the end of the testimony in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rice v. Union Railroad Company, 58 A. 629, 26 R.I. 128, 1904 R.I. LEXIS 40 (R.I. 1904).

58 A. 629 (Rice v. Union Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.