Rice v. Sussman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rice v. Sussman

242 A.D. 801

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D. 801 (Rice v. Sussman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rice v. Sussman, 242 A.D. 801 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action for wrongful conversion reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event, unless within ten days from the entry of the order herein respondent stipulate to reduce the amount of the judgment to $1,000 and costs, in which event the judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs. The findings of fact and conclusions of law are modified accordingly. There is a suggestion that the accounts receivable had been transferred to a corporation. In that event there may be a conversion of those accounts receivable. For the purpose of producing proof thereon, the judgment is reversed unless the respondent stipulate as aforesaid. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action for wrongful conversion reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event, unless within ten days from the entry of the order herein respondent stipulate to reduce the amount of the judgment to $1,000 and costs, in which event the judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs. The findings of fact and conclusions of law are modified accordingly. There is a suggestion that the accounts receivable had been transferred to a corporation. In that event there may be a conversion of those accounts receivable. For the purpose of producing proof thereon, the judgment is reversed unless the respondent stipulate as aforesaid. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D. 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-sussman-nyappdiv-1934.