Rice v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Rice v. State

150 S.W. 1197, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 692

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rice v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 77 Tex. Crim. 617 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 6, 1912·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, J.

The appellant was convicted of petty theft, and his penalty fixed at a fine of $5 and 10 days' confinement in the county sail. There is no bill of exceptions in the record, nor is there any statement of facts. None of the questions attempted to be raised by appellant in his motion for new trial can be considered or passed upon without a statement of facts. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRENDERGAST, J.

The appellant was convicted of petty theft, and his penalty fixed at a fine of $5 and 10 days' confinement in the county sail. There is no bill of exceptions in the record, nor is there any statement of facts. None of the questions attempted to be raised by appellant in his motion for new trial can be considered or passed upon without a statement of facts. The judgment is affirmed.

Rice v. State, 150 S.W. 1197, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 692 (Tex. 1912).

Pincite

150 S.W. 1197 (Rice v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.