Rice v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rice v. State

578 S.W.3d 863

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rice v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 550 S.W.3d 565 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 30, 2019·No. WD 81688·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

*864Jerry Rice appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rice raises a single claim on appeal; he argues that the motion court erred in rejecting his claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to use testimony from the State's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Fisher, during closing argument to challenge the credibility of the State's key witness. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

*864Jerry Rice appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rice raises a single claim on appeal; he argues that the motion court erred in rejecting his claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to use testimony from the State's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Fisher, during closing argument to challenge the credibility of the State's key witness. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Rice v. State, 578 S.W.3d 863 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

578 S.W.3d 863 (Rice v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.