Rice v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rice v. State

578 S.W.3d 863

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 30, 2019

DocketWD 81688

StatusPublished

This text of 578 S.W.3d 863 (Rice v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rice v. State, 578 S.W.3d 863 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

*864Jerry Rice appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rice raises a single claim on appeal; he argues that the motion court erred in rejecting his claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to use testimony from the State's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Fisher, during closing argument to challenge the credibility of the State's key witness. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

*864Jerry Rice appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rice raises a single claim on appeal; he argues that the motion court erred in rejecting his claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to use testimony from the State's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Fisher, during closing argument to challenge the credibility of the State's key witness. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 S.W.3d 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-state-moctapp-2019.