Rice v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Rice v. State

197 S.E. 349, 58 Ga. App. 15, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 168

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 20, 1938·No. 26793·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The accused was convicted of an assault with intent to rape; and his motion for new trial contained only the general grounds. The other two judges of the first division of this court are of the opinion that the verdict was authorized by the evidence. The view of the [16] writer is that the evidence authorized only a verdict for assault and battery.

Decided May 20, 1938. O. Grady Gillon, David R. Ramey, for plaintiff in error. Charles H. Garrell, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur. Broyles, O. J-, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The accused was convicted of an assault with intent to rape; and his motion for new trial contained only the general grounds. The other two judges of the first division of this court are of the opinion that the verdict was authorized by the evidence. The view of the [16] writer is that the evidence authorized only a verdict for assault and battery.

Decided May 20, 1938. O. Grady Gillon, David R. Ramey, for plaintiff in error. Charles H. Garrell, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur. Broyles, O. J-, dissents.

Rice v. State, 197 S.E. 349, 58 Ga. App. 15, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 168 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

197 S.E. 349 (Rice v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.