Rice v. State

103 S.E. 196, 25 Ga. App. 321, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 773
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 11, 1920
Docket11392
StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 196 (Rice v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rice v. State, 103 S.E. 196, 25 Ga. App. 321, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 773 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The charge of the court as to impeachment of witnesses did not confuse and mislead the jury; and when the entire charge is read, there is no harmful error in the instructions complained of.

The verdict of involuntary manslaughter was authorized by the evidence; and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 196, 25 Ga. App. 321, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-state-gactapp-1920.