Rice v. State

195 So. 411, 142 Fla. 624, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1425
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 12, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 195 So. 411 (Rice v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rice v. State, 195 So. 411, 142 Fla. 624, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1425 (Fla. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On indictment charging murder in the second degree plaintiff in error was convicted of manslaughter and comes here on writ of error.

Examination of the record discloses no reversible error and, therefore, the judgment should be affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

*625 Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 So. 411, 142 Fla. 624, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-state-fla-1940.