Rice v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Rice v. State

195 So. 411, 142 Fla. 624, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1425

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 12, 1940·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On indictment charging murder in the second degree plaintiff in error was convicted of manslaughter and comes here on writ of error.

Examination of the record discloses no reversible error and, therefore, the judgment should be affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

*625 Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On indictment charging murder in the second degree plaintiff in error was convicted of manslaughter and comes here on writ of error.

Examination of the record discloses no reversible error and, therefore, the judgment should be affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

*625 Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Rice v. State, 195 So. 411, 142 Fla. 624, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1425 (Fla. 1940).

Pincite

195 So. 411 (Rice v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.