Rice v. Sanger

Supreme Court

Rice v. Sanger

144 U.S. 197, 12 S. Ct. 664, 36 L. Ed. 403, 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2068

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 28, 1892

Docket1400

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 144 U.S. 197 (Rice v. Sanger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rice v. Sanger, 144 U.S. 197, 12 S. Ct. 664, 36 L. Ed. 403, 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2068 (1892).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chief Justice :

This was an action commenced by one Rice against Sanger et al. in the District Court of Bourbon County, Kansas, wherein judgment was rendered February 27, 1888, in favor of plaintiff. The cause was thereupon taken by the defendants to the Supreme Court of that State, the judgment reversed, and the cause remandad for further proceedings in accordance with the views of the court as expressed in its written opinion. To review this judgment, a writ of error from this court was allowed, but after that, the case went back to the state district court in accordance with the-mandate of the Supreme Court, and was subsequently tried therein.

The judgment attempted to be brought here was not a final judgment, and the writ of error is Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chief Justice :

This was an action commenced by one Rice against Sanger et al. in the District Court of Bourbon County, Kansas, wherein judgment was rendered February 27, 1888, in favor of plaintiff. The cause was thereupon taken by the defendants to the Supreme Court of that State, the judgment reversed, and the cause remandad for further proceedings in accordance with the views of the court as expressed in its written opinion. To review this judgment, a writ of error from this court was allowed, but after that, the case went back to the state district court in accordance with the-mandate of the Supreme Court, and was subsequently tried therein.

The judgment attempted to be brought here was not a final judgment, and the writ of error is Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 U.S. 197, 12 S. Ct. 664, 36 L. Ed. 403, 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-sanger-scotus-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack