Rice v. Rice

161 S.E. 594, 173 Ga. 804, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 409
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 13, 1931
DocketNo. 8537
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 161 S.E. 594 (Rice v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rice v. Rice, 161 S.E. 594, 173 Ga. 804, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 409 (Ga. 1931).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. On the issues as to mental capacity of a grantor and undue influence exercised by the grantee in a suit to set aside certain deeds the following evidence'was admissible: “And he [A. J. Rice Sr.] seemed to be suffering from almost a complete loss of memory; and when he would make himself understood at all, his utterances and the [805]*805thoughts he seemed to be trying to convey indicated a complete loss of mental control.”

No. 8537. November 13, 1931.

2. On the conflicting evidence the judge did not err, after the grant of a nonsuit, in revoking the order of nonsuit at the same term and in reinstating the ease. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Copeland & Dulces, for plaintiffs in error. W. E. Perry and Liltle & Dickerson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fuller v. Stone
61 S.E.2d 467 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.E. 594, 173 Ga. 804, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-rice-ga-1931.