Rice v. Rice
This text of 161 S.E. 594 (Rice v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. On the issues as to mental capacity of a grantor and undue influence exercised by the grantee in a suit to set aside certain deeds the following evidence'was admissible: “And he [A. J. Rice Sr.] seemed to be suffering from almost a complete loss of memory; and when he would make himself understood at all, his utterances and the [805]*805thoughts he seemed to be trying to convey indicated a complete loss of mental control.”
2. On the conflicting evidence the judge did not err, after the grant of a nonsuit, in revoking the order of nonsuit at the same term and in reinstating the ease. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 S.E. 594, 173 Ga. 804, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-rice-ga-1931.