Rice v. Rhode

175 A.D.2d 604

This text of 175 A.D.2d 604 (Rice v. Rhode) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rice v. Rhode, 175 A.D.2d 604 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs and judgment granted to plaintiffs for relief requested in complaint. Memorandum: The court erred in granting defendants a prescriptive easement over plaintiffs’ property because defendants failed to establish use of the right-of-way for the first three years of the prescriptive period. Evidence that unknown third parties used the right-of-way during that time was insufficient to establish the prescriptive easement (see, Warwick Materials v J.K. Produce Farms, 111 AD2d 805, 807). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Houston, J. — Prescriptive Easement.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Warwick Materials, Inc. v. J. K. Produce Farms, Inc.
111 A.D.2d 805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 A.D.2d 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-rhode-nyappdiv-1991.