Rice v. McWilliams
This text of 253 A.D. 869 (Rice v. McWilliams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order as to defendants Upson affirmed, with costs, and as to defendant McWilliams reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the finding of the jury that the defendant McWilliams was negligent was against the weight of the evidence. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
253 A.D. 869, 1 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-mcwilliams-nyappdiv-1938.