Rice v. McElhannon

Supreme Court of Missouri

Rice v. McElhannon

48 Mo. 224

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedJuly 15, 1871

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 48 Mo. 224 (Rice v. McElhannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rice v. McElhannon, 48 Mo. 224 (Mo. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The respondent now brings into this court a perfect transcript of the record, and asks for an affirmance of the judgment rendered in the court below.

It appears that the appeal was allowed and taken in August, 1870, and that no steps have been taken by the appellants to prosecute the same; and as the action was on a promissory note, and the appeal seems to have been taken for delay, the judgment will be affirmed, with ten per cent, damages.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The respondent now brings into this court a perfect transcript of the record, and asks for an affirmance of the judgment rendered in the court below.

It appears that the appeal was allowed and taken in August, 1870, and that no steps have been taken by the appellants to prosecute the same; and as the action was on a promissory note, and the appeal seems to have been taken for delay, the judgment will be affirmed, with ten per cent, damages.

The other judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 Mo. 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-mcelhannon-mo-1871.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack